The Royals signed Kevin Kouzmanoff to a minor league deal (that becomes a $1 million dollar contract if he's on the roster) earlier today, in the kind of typical Dayton Moore move that no one saw coming. I should say first that I like the move, though I'm not entirely sure how it is going to actually benefit the Royals barring a strange combination of events. So maybe I don't like it that much.
Here's what we know:

So as a bench player that really never plays, Kouzmanoff wouldn't really be that exciting. He's better than Yuni, in so much as he can actually do one thing well, but it's basically a different version of that whole argument. As a baseball fan and wannabe analyst, I like thinking about depth and tactics and all that, but the reality is that isn't the way the game is managed, not regarding position players in an era of huge bullpens.
So the only other angle here, as Retro mentioned earlier today, is that Kouz is some kind of Moose insurance or Moose motivator. I'll add another: a scenario in which the Royals delayed Moose's service time clock at the start of 2012, using Kouzmanoff to do so.
Moose hit .263/.309/.367 last season, accumulating 111 days of service time in the process. If this were a computer simulation, I would 100% start Moose in AAA to begin the year. For one, I'm not sure he's actually earned a starting job in the Majors from a purely performance based standpoint. Two, the Royals have the incentive by the structure of MLB's CBA to delay and stagger his emergence as a regular player. Overwhelmingly, the chances are that whether Moose is a Royal on Opening Day or sometime in May this season won't alter his arbitration and free agency schedule, there's a case to be made that for insurance reasons the Royals should be conservative. If Moose breaks his arm and misses a year in Omaha, the Royals lose nothing, if he does so on a rainy night in Cleveland in April, he accumulates an entire year of Major League service time. Readers with an extremely good memory might note that I've made this argument before. While the big cutoff dates (Super 2, etc) get the most attention, the trajectory of players' careers is unpredictable. Look at Alex Gordon's ups and downs. Who is to say the Royals won't randomly demote Moose for three weeks in 2013? We just don't know.
And rounding back to the first thing we mentioned about Moustakas, he's far from a polished product.
Of course, none of this will happen. And perhaps, it shouldn't. The Royals have a human relationship with Moustakas, who is legitimately a major part of their future. They need to nurture him and make him feel like an integral part of the organization. Nickel and diming him (which would be the perception, if not the reality) by sending him back to AAA to start 2012 is likely not something that would be good for the relationship. Nor with their relationship with other players, or for their marketing position with the fans.
Nevertheless, Kouzmanoff gives the Royals the ability to do this thing that they would never do. Which I guess is fun.
0 recs | 65 comments
This isn't a bad signing, actually
Kouzmanoff can’t take a walk to save his life and I suspect the “advanced” metrics have somewhat overstated his ability in the field, but it’s a minor-league deal with no real risk so why not? They shouldn’t do it just to game Moustakas’ service time, but it’s justifiable on other terms. Moustakas should start the season in the big leagues, but despite the hot start, he really did struggle. I don’t believe in platooning young core players, but if you want to plan to give Moose his usual days off against lefties, Kouzmanoff could be helpful there. HE never walks and has some power, so who knows, maybe this is one possible outcome for Moose which is short of entertaining/scary.
If the team wants to keep Getz around and is willing to let play short in emergency situations, Kouzmanoff could round out the bench nicely. And having those two guys as your backup infielders prevents something really silly and pointless, like bringing back Yunkiesy Betancourt.
Matt Klaassen - January 14, 2012
or worse, _Yuniesky_ Betancourt
Matt Klaassen - January 14, 2012
I think I prefer Yunkiesy.
EspeciallyK - January 14, 2012
lolwut
tiquanunderwear - January 14, 2012
Either Was He's
Still Batter Nine You Sucky.
philofthenorth - January 14, 2012
Maybe Yuckiesky?
WestCoastRoyal - January 14, 2012
.
Like that is any different than half of the rest of the team.
Jeff Zimmerman - January 14, 2012
Moustakas and Kouzmanoff
a very byzantine hot corner
Freneau - January 14, 2012
And a juicy positional battle for Greece's WBC team
thelaundry - January 14, 2012
Reminds me of the words of the immortal Socrates, who said:
“I drank what?”
Sweep_the_Leg - January 14, 2012
nice reference.
….in fact, you might even call the Kouz signing a ‘moral imperative’
DickHowser4ever - January 15, 2012
indeed.
ChrisCEIT - January 15, 2012
Yunkiesy sounds like something you'd get at Taco Bell
thelaundry - January 14, 2012
As An After
Effect.
philofthenorth - January 14, 2012
Lovin the Kouz
I really like this signing. Give him a shot in Spring Training. If he doesn’t make it, nothing hurt. If he does, you have a guy who can give Mouse a day off and actually play some defense. He can also give Hosmer a day off at first against AL teams so Billy can still DH. It’ll be interesting to see if they go with 7 or 8 bullpen arms if Kouz makes the team. If they go with 8, Chris Getz is a minor leaguer again.
Somedevil17 - January 14, 2012
Is this the official end of Chris Getz
Who would you rather have on the bench? Kousmanoff or Getz?
This is gong to make it even harder for Yost to hang onto one of his favorities come April and may just push him to keep one less pitcher which would be a positive.
DownUnderFan - January 14, 2012
no way yuni, Getz, and kouz can all be on the roster
Freneau - January 14, 2012 via iPhone app
No, but the 3 of them would be sweet on a new sitcom on FX.
Kinda like It’s Always Sunny meets Justified.
A. B. Aird - January 14, 2012
Thunder Gun Express 2!
Go for it.
thelaundry - January 14, 2012
I don't mind if all, or any, of the three are on someone's roster, just not ours. And still we wait for the real issue to be addressed: starting pitching.
Steve Hovley - January 14, 2012
paulino will make 60 starts
he’s the #1 and #3 starter
Freneau - January 14, 2012
Steve Hovley!
Oh. Never mind.
thelaundry - January 14, 2012
It's too bad the show only lasted three seasons...
Loose Seal - January 15, 2012
In case you didn' know, the show is coming back for a nine
or ten episode mini-series leading up to a movie. Probably in 2013.
Can’t wait!!
KCROYALS64 - January 15, 2012
Oswalt asking price
down to 9 mil for 1 year or less according to MLB Trade rumor-
Royals offer 2 years 15 mil- it upgrades the rotation and doesn’t weigh us down long term with too much risk
ribman - January 15, 2012
and he refuses to sign it....which he would do
billybeingbilly - January 15, 2012
Personally, I'd rather have Getz.
I think Getz offers more versatility, I think the bigger question mark is Giavotella, Getz can take a walk, has speed, and most importantly, hits left-handed.
That isn’t to say Kouz doesn’t have his advantages, but his defensive value at 3B does nothing for me, and I see that as his biggest asset.
hawkinscm87 - January 14, 2012
Getz > Kouz
In Ron Polk Points
RoyalsRetro - January 14, 2012
How does Getz offer more versatility when he can play exactly one position??
His noodle arm is barely good enough for 2B.
EspeciallyK - January 14, 2012
Well, he can play SS, technically.
But the bigger point is that I’m talking about offensively and defensively.
hawkinscm87 - January 14, 2012
Really?
Then why has no MLB team ever actually tried him there given his decidedly SS bat?
Sweep_the_Leg - January 14, 2012
Because he's not as good there.
hawkinscm87 - January 14, 2012
Because he's completely unacceptable there
Sweep_the_Leg - January 15, 2012
I still fail to see how a player who can only play one position and is a terrible hitter offers more versatility than another guy who is a better hitter and also plays one position.
EspeciallyK - January 14, 2012
Because Getz can play SS.
hawkinscm87 - January 14, 2012
If he could, then why the hell would the Royals have paid $2M to #%^}{}£ Betancourt
to back up Escobar?
Sweep_the_Leg - January 15, 2012
No, he clearly can't.
His arm is pathetic, there is no way in hell he has the arm to play an adequate shortstop…and as already mentioned, if he could play SS then DM wouldn’t have felt the need to specifically find someone who could backup Escobar. There’s a reason he’s only played 26 innings at SS in his career.
Sure, he can stand at the shortstop position, but that doesn’t mean he can play there.
EspeciallyK - January 15, 2012
You're getting away from the point.
Getz is by no means a utility man, but then again, neither is Yuni or Kouzmanoff. If I’m looking for a bench player, though, I’m going to prefer someone like Getz who can conceivably play other positions in the infield. And playing a solid 2B and being able to handle SS is pretty good. No, Getz doesn’t have a great arm, but that’s only going to hurt him when/if he makes a play in the hole. You can keep saying Getz can’t play SS all you want, and his defensive versatility is certainly not great, but we’re comparing him to Kouzmanoff.
Offensively, Kouzmanoff and Getz are two bad options. But, I still think Getz is better. He hits left-handed, can take a walk, and he will hit for a higher average. Kouzmanoff will hit for more extra bases, but he’s been on a steady decline the last couple of years. He was never very good to begin with, and when his power + avg started sliding, he became virtually worthless because his glove at 3B doesn’t justify him playing.
Keep arguing that Getz has a weak arm though. That, of course, means that Kouzmanoff is a better bench player. Sure, because having 2 third basemen is very desirable.
hawkinscm87 - January 15, 2012
Well, Getz is so versatile that DM has brought in a guy specifically to back up both 2B and 3B now.
Just because you say Getz can handle SS doesn’t mean he can. His arm is clearly weak and that affects ALL plays at shortstop, not just ones in the hole.
I didn’t call Kouz more versatile. They are both equally versatile. They both can’t hit and both play one position and one position only.
EspeciallyK - January 15, 2012
Well I'm glad we can stop arguing now.
hawkinscm87 - January 15, 2012
I don't Getz it
I have no reason to give for Getz staying if it comes down to him vs Kousmanoff.
Getz has no power, not great defence, not good off the bench, etc, etc, etc. (has speed, about it)
At least Kous has a really good glove, and even though his bat has been not happening the last couple of years, we know that he does have .275 season in his recent past.
Plus I’m sure that Getz would look great in a Chicago uniform again.
1Yankh8tr - January 14, 2012
If you're trying to make a case for Getz, I think you succeeded.
hawkinscm87 - January 14, 2012
If your'e trying to hide your mancrush on Getz, well..................
1Yankh8tr - January 15, 2012
That doesn't make any sense.
You made a bad argument against Getz. Kouzmanoff has a .275 season in his recent past? Does recent mean 3 years ago? Apparently. All we can say about Kouzmanoff is that he plays third base well (we think), but hasn’t had a decent offensive season since 2009. That’s not a glowing evaluation.
But yeah, I have a mancrush on Getz because I think EVEN HE would be more useful off the bench than Kouzmanoff. A backup corner IF compared to a backup middle IF. My opinion is that Getz is a better bench option.
hawkinscm87 - January 15, 2012
Ok, but...
Ok, you like Getz over Kous, I get it, but why? What has Getz done here? Jack squat…maybe not even that much.
I’m not all that crazy bout either, but…
Getz has no bat – No D – No clutch bat – Not a switch hitter – Already have Yuni to cover for Gia – Kous is insurance for Moose
Your’e right, that makes no sense.
1Yankh8tr - January 15, 2012
Wow.
You just pointed out that Kouz is insurance for Moose. Thanks.
hawkinscm87 - January 15, 2012
Will, you mentioned how the Royals are treating Moose as a human, perhaps hoping for reciprocity later on...
I’m sure you meant it, but you did not expressly mention the possible effect this has when dealing with Scott Boras in the case of Moose other clients. It certainly hasn’t been proved, but the Royals have had tremendous success with Boras clients as of late.
hawkinscm87 - January 14, 2012
i dont know if id call it tremendous success....
they’ve paid market value for all of his guys. they seem to have a good working relationship with boras, which is nice. However, its not like he gave the royals a discount for chens services or anything like that
billybeingbilly - January 14, 2012
Right...
But we aren’t nickel and diming his clients when it comes to Super 2, which could provide an advantage when it comes to extending players through some free agency years. I’m not sure the Royals are intentionally doing this because I personally think Scott Boras has a reputation to uphold, and I don’t think he’s going to make any concessions because he doesn’t have to.
hawkinscm87 - January 14, 2012
i think the relationship with the player is what matters...
and the not nickel and diming them might matter to them. boras is always going to advise them to wait for FA.
billybeingbilly - January 14, 2012
True.
I sometimes forget that Boras clients can think for themselves.
hawkinscm87 - January 14, 2012
carlos gonzalez and jared weaver are recent examples....
they still got paid very very well though
billybeingbilly - January 14, 2012
Hu-man?
RoyalsRetro - January 14, 2012
flesh and blood
a man
Freneau - January 14, 2012
He's Only Human
philofthenorth - January 14, 2012
Born to make mistakes......
la flama blanca - January 15, 2012
we all burp and fart and that's the way God planned it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKhYoeC-X-Q
ChrisCEIT - January 15, 2012
any chance that Sietzer can work his magic and get Kouz's bat working again
like he did with Frenchy
DickHowser4ever - January 15, 2012
I guess it has to be possible
Freneau - January 15, 2012
Seitzer
hawkinscm87 - January 15, 2012
Even if Kouz revives his career
If he has more than 150 PAs with the Royals its probably a really bad thing.
RoyalsRetro - January 15, 2012
"Probably", but what if
our offense is SO good, that we need to bring in Yuni, Kouz, and Mitch every game in the 6th inning so our starters don’t get worn out in all the 20-1 blowouts we rack up. What if?
Loose Seal - January 15, 2012
When Kouzmanoff was with the padres
I thought he had upside. But now?
ChosenOneK - January 15, 2012
Isn't he 30 now?
hawkinscm87 - January 15, 2012
30 is the new 28!
Bronzillo - January 16, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Royals Review to post a comment.