SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Royals Review

Happy Birthday Buddy Biancalana and Pat Tabler!!!

Oh what a day this is for Royals fans. Today Buddy Biancalana turns 52 and Pat Tabler turns 54.

Biancalana played six seasons for the Royals (1982-87) hitting .213/.269/.304. Even in the 1980s, that wasn't much offense, as that's an OPS+ of 56. In 1985, the year the Royals won the World Series, Buddy played in 81 games and hit a TPJ-esque .188, though he did somehow manage a .277 OBP. Nobody talks about his awesome '86 however, when he hit .242 and nearly manged a .300 OBP (.298).

Tabler was a Royal from 1988-90, hitting .279/.339/.347. Tabler joined the Royals in 1988 after being traded from Cleveland for Bud Black. In 1990, he was sent to the Mets in return for eventual Royal legend Archie Corbin.

It's a terrible shame these two never played together.

0 recs  |  7 comments

Comments

Pat Tabler for Buddy Black

Was the first trade that happened since I became a fan actively following the team. I was excited because Black was the 5th starter and Tabler was a guy I didn’t know about, but they said he was once an All-Star.

He was a pretty light hitting first baseman/DH, but he was the epitome of CLUTCH. It was really uncanny. He was a pretty mild-mannered hitter most of the time, but he was just unreal with runners on base. I think one year he was 8-9 with the bases loaded.

Here’s what I wrote about Tabler on my dead blog:

"Clutch hitting" is an amorphous concept difficult to define and even harder to ascertain. Some believe that certain players have an innate ability to rise to the occasion, while others believe the concept is a product of small sample sizes and selective observation. Critics of the concept of clutch also point out that many of the players deemed as "clutch" are simply great players who are good in all situations, clutch or non-clutch. The concept of clutch also begs the question – why don’t clutch players perform as well in non-clutch situations? Are they just not trying as hard?

If there was a poster-boy for the concept of clutch it was Pat Tabler. Overall, "Tabs" was a pretty mediocre hitter with little power for a first baseman. But with the bases loaded, Pat Tabler was like Dr. Bruce Banner transforming into the Incredible Hulk. TABLER WANT TO SMASH BALL!

It began in 1983, when Tabler went 11 for 19 with the bases loaded. The next season, he was 5 for 9. In 1985, he was near perfect, going 6 for 7 with a grand slam. His clutch took a year off in 1986, but returned the next year as Tabler went 5 for 9. In 1988, he had an insane run, going 8 for 9 with the bases jammed. That is not just good performance in the clutch, that is near automatic performance in the clutch. During those six seasons, he was an amazing 37 for 63 (.587). With the bases loaded, Tabler was more likely to get a hit than make an out.

Having an ability to hit with the bases loaded makes some intuitive sense because of the unique circumstances of the situation. A pitcher is going to be more likely to give the hitter a pitch he can handle, to avoid walking in a run. This is even more likely when a hitter like Pat Tabler and his .379 career slugging percentage is up. Perhaps Tabler had very good bat control and an ability to handle hittable pitches.

But Tabler’s clutch was not simply confined to situations when the bases were loaded. With a runner at third, late in the game with two outs, Tabler hit 89 for 205 (.434). Even in all situations with runners in scoring position, his numbers were well above his career norms. These numbers also refute the idea that Tabler’s success was a mere product of small sample size.

So perhaps Pat Tabler had some mystical ability to come through in the clutch, mesmerizing opponents with his golden locks. Or maybe he’s just a freakish outlier. Who knows?

When I first starting post at Royalboard, I posted under the handle “Pat Tabler” as a tip of the cap to our mulleted friend.

seem to remember Buddy Biancalana having some rather impressive defensive skills.

perhaps his uber light hitting should be combined with his sweet picking defense to even out his legacy as an adequate (80s) SS.

Didn't he appear on Letterman?

I know Letterman made a running gag of his name during the World Series.

Pretty sure he did.

Met him once, seemed like a really down to earth guy.

Here's what he's up to now

http://pmpmsports.com/

I guess both of these guys are pretty crummy hitters who stepped it up and became “clutch.”

In the 1985 Royals Yearbook it listed each player's career highs.

Biancalana’s career high in batting average was .500! I was seven and my mind was blown! This guy was better than George Brett! How many ABs do you think that was? I’m guessing 2.

Prepare to be even more amazed

His OPS was 2.167! Triple slash was .500/.667/1.500.

3 PA, with a 3B, a walk, and a GIDP.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Royals Review to post a comment.